Capacity Building and Community Involvement: Orange County Asian Pacific Islander Community Alliance (OCAPICA):
Natalie Collins, M.S.W. Outreach and Technical Assistance Coordinator
Our
Community Research Collaboration awards encourage growth in
organizational capacity and community
participation among community agencies
involved in research. An excellent
example is OCAPICA, which started in
1997 when community leaders mobilized
to address health care, policy, and
employment issues for Asian Pacific
Islanders (APIs) living in Southern
California. The organization grew to
eight volunteers and sixteen board
members
and successfully leveraged a
$76,000 coalition-building grant from
the California Endowment.
OCAPICA then teamed up with Marjorie Kagawa Singer, a researcher at UCLA. We funded Mary Anne Foo, executive director of OCAPICA, and Dr. Kagawa Singer with a $100,000 pilot award followed by a $500,000 full award for a project entitled, “Improving Breast Health Access for Hmong Women and Men.” The project focused on screening rates among Hmong women in Southern California and the lack of culturally appropriate materials for this community to inform women about screening and breast health.
Capacity Building and
Growth
OCAPICA continued their communitybased
participatory research projects
focusing on cancer prevention and
leveraged funding from other agencies
like the National Cancer Institute,
the California Wellness Foundation,
the CDC, and the Office of Minority
Health. Additional funding has led
to a budget of over $1.5 million for
programs related to cancer prevention,
education policy, youth leadership, and
community and economic development.
OCAPICA built capacity by investing
in the administrative arm of their organization
and supporting and training
other organizations working on API
health issues. OCAPICA also invested
in a financial administrator with grant
funds management experience, who
created investment policies and utilized
indirect costs provided by their CBCRP
grant to build administrative capacity
for the organization. Research findings
were shared with other organizations
so that existing knowledge and lessons
learned were built upon to create
culturally tailored projects for specific
API communities. The organization
continues to mentor those interested in
health professions about appropriate
ways to do research in the community;
students get mentored in communitybased
participatory research by both
academicians and community leaders.
Educating Providers and
Legislators
OCAPICA shares research results with
health care providers, highlighting
issues related to linguistic and cultural
barriers to health care. The organization
(along with community members)
has visited legislators in Sacramento to discuss language and
access issues.
Their findings with specific Asian communities
have helped disaggregate data
that are often lumped together. In fact,
the Hmong project enabled the team
to publish the first U.S. data related
to screening rates for Hmong women.
They have also talked with state data
gathering entities like the California
Health Information Service about
including other Asian groups and oversampling
underrepresented groups like
Cambodians.
Community Involvement
In addition to capacity building,
OCAPICA has successfully involved
community members directly in
research projects. While conducting
the Hmong study, the partners engaged
the entire community by inviting men
and spiritual leaders to encourage study
participation among Hmong women.
This strategy enabled a safe and
encouraging space for breast cancer
survivors to share their personal experiences
and social support for others who
might have suffered their breast cancer
experience alone. The study facilitated
a significant change in the community,
where breast health issues could be discussed
openly with collective support.
The community advocated for a cancer
support group and addressed other
sensitive issues like pain management
and sexual health.
The community also takes a direct role
in research projects by their participation
in a Community IRB (Institutional
Review Board). A Community IRB
puts the control back into the community
as they decide what types
of research projects would be most
beneficial, ensure cultural sensitivity
and relevance, and safeguard confidentiality.
This IRB is composed of pastors,
community leaders, therapists, and
researchers working in the community.
Over the past two years, this community
IRB has approved over 12 projects.
OCAPICA offers several tips for growing
organizational capacity: (1) organizations
should request the full amount
of money required to conduct a study
(many tend to underestimate and depend
on volunteer time); (2) invest time
into strategic planning and fundraising;
(3) keep up with the latest technology
and take advantage of resources that
offer free- to low-cost technology;
(4) identify mentors who will provide
information on HIPAA regulations,
proposal writing, data ownership, and
grant management; and (5) collaborate
with other agencies to share lessons
learned from the research process.
We encourage other organizations to
adopt similar capacity and leveraging
strategies and join OCAPICA as one of
the leaders in building organizational
capacity and involving community
through the research process.
