Goals, Expected Outcomes, and Methods

The evaluation's goals were to achieve the following:

Expected Outcomes

The following short and intermediate outcomes were expected from the New Investigator Awards:

Methods

The CBCRP evaluation intern conducted twenty surveys with new investigators from funding cycles I-V. 2 The survey included both closed and open-ended questions and was administered either over the phone or electronically via e-mail. The survey was similar to a previously employed survey designed by the CBCRP to evaluate the Postdoctoral Fellowship Awards, another career development award. The survey was designed to assess whether the new investigators were currently working in the field of breast cancer, evaluate the impact of the award on their current career, determine measurable outcomes from the research conducted such as number of published papers, and elicit feedback from respondents about the CBCRP. The survey was pilot tested and minor changes were made before implementation.

The evaluation intern updated contact information, sent initial contact letters via e-mail, and followed up with each potential respondent to explain the study and arrange telephone interviews. Telephone interviews lasted between 15 and 45 minutes.

Eligibility for the study consisted of the following requirements:

2 Cycles I-V occurred during 1995-1999. Awards from the fifth cycle typically ended in 2001.
3 The evauation was limited to cycles I-V to capture information from completed grants only.